Heraclitus as Sage in Plutarch
and Clement of Alexandria
Andrew C. Dinan
Ave Maria University
Although
the importance of Plutarch and Clement of Alexandria for the constitution
of the text of Heraclitus is well known, the influence of Heraclitus on their
works has received much less attention, despite the numerous and often noteworthy
occasions on which they adduce citations from the Ephesian philosopher. Setting
aside the questions of the source and utility of their knowledge of the Heraclitean
fragments, I investigate the purposes that animate such citations and the
manner in which these citations are made. My concern is not to establish
the ipsissima verba Heracliti, a goal that has given rise to numerous studies over
the last two centuries, but to examine the citations within their respective
contexts. As a way to evince the distinctive appropriations of Heraclitus
by Plutarch and Clement, I undertake a comparison of certain citations common
to both authors. With particular attention to the citations of Heraclitus
DK 27 (M 74) at the end of Plutarch, fragment 178 (Sandbach), and Clement, Protrepticus 22.1, Stromateis 4.144.3,
I argue that the Ephesian offered both authors an attractive and authoritative
testimony about arcane subjects, especially matters post mortem. Plutarch appropriates Heraclitus as a witness
to the immortality of the soul. Clement invokes him for this purpose
as well, but there is the additional suggestion that Heraclitus, like a prophet,
unmasks the vanities of Greek religion and points to the reality of the Last
Judgment.