Pandora and Strife:
The Mistaken Perception of Misogyny in Hesiod
Jon Zarecki
University of Florida
The Pandora story has often been viewed as the origin of a perceived Greek
misogyny. According to Hesiod, she is either the worst bane man has
ever contended with (Th. 585), or she is responsible for releasing a plethora
of evils upon the earth which did not exist before (WD 94-5). Women are the reason that men must work
hard (WD 91), and a bad marriage gives everlasting pain to
the husband (Th. 611-12). However,
the text also reveals that everything in this story happens with the assent
of Zeus (Th. 613, WD 105),
and it is in fact Zeus who sends the woman into the world (WD 84). Pandora is a gift designed to punish men
for taking a gift. She is in fact a kalon kakon ant' agathoio (Th. 585), and she serves to counter the blessed exsistence
which man enjoyed before (WD 90). But
it is precisely because she is a balance against all that was right with
the first race of men that we should not view Hesiod's texts as the source
of all Greek misogyny. Pandora is not responsible for her lot, nor
does she cause evil on her own accord. Rather she is part of a divine
balancing act, the instrument for introducing Good Strife into a world which
only knew Bad Strife, or no Strife at all.
It cannot be coincidence that Hesiod moves directly from the story of the
two kinds of Strife into the story of Pandora. The two Strifes do not
appear anywhere else in the two works. Even the brief interlude of
the "lords greedy for gifts" backs up the identification of Pandora
with the two Strifes. Only the rich could afford to endure a woman
who acts like a drone, using up all the stores of the house (Th.
594-95). Yet the Good Strife forces men to work hard, which is considered
an evil when it concerns women. As I will demonstrate, Hesiod uses women
as a way for explaining the balance in life between good and bad. His
Pandora serves to counter-balance the good in men's lives, much as there
is a Good Strife to balance a Bad Strife.